| I bid thee, tell me more...   Canasta anyone?           Two strong bids mean"fire is in the hole..."
   Bridge wasn't meant to be a solo activity - it's hard enough with TWO 
    opponents... | Is 3S forcing in this auction? 1S - (P) - 2H - (P);3S - All Pass
 Partner holds:    9   K x x x x x x 
      Q x x   A J x x 
    First, your partner should not have bid 2H with this holding!  The correct 
    response was to call “Director” - your partner's distribution is 1=7=3=4, 
    that adds up the 15 cards! 
    Seriously, I’m sure you have a typo in your EMAIL.  For the sake of 
    argument, let's assume partner is really holding 1=5=3=4 shape.  Assuming 
    you are playing Standard American bidding (as opposed to a system such as 
    2/1), responder’s 2 level response promises at least one rebid.  After all, 
    partner is promising 10+ points so the partnership should be able to make at 
    least 2 Notrump or a 3 level contract. 
    Your 3S bid is absolutely game forcing, showing extra Spade length 
    and overall strength.  Your partner should not be shocked by your Spade 
    jump, holding a singleton.  While your partner apparently hoped you would 
    have made another bid, partner should be happy that you have a very good 6 
    card Spade suit or a nice 7 card Spade suit and game forcing values (at 
    least a medium hand of 15+ playing points).   
    Unfortunately, many emerging players become distressed when they cannot help 
    partner and perceive a terrible misfit, erroneously leading them to pass. 
    So should partner bid 4H, hoping opener has some undisclosed Hearts?  
    Not really - if you had any interest in learning about a possible Heart fit, 
    you would have bid a 3 level minor.  Sure, your partner would like to bid 
    4H, but there is a problem here.  Look at the suit quality -- 
    partner is “King and out”.  So partner's bid should be clear - reply 4S. 
     
    While a 6-1 suit fit isn't our favorite, your partner should trust your 
    judgment after you bid 3S.  You are showing a great suit, good hand, 
    and aren't interested in playing the contract elsewhere.  Thus, your partner 
    should not hang you with these holdings.    
    Ever see players needless go back and forth, insisting on bidding their own 
    hand instead of listening and cooperating with aggregate partnership 
    assets?   It almost seems like a lovers quarrel, doesn’t it? 
    I recommend you review various forcing and non-forcing bidding scenarios 
    with your partner.   The results will definitely be worth the effort.  
    Two good books to use as a guide are Mike Lawrence's "Partnership 
    Understandings" and the Granovetter's "Forgive 
    Me Partner" |