| Zero Tolerance - The ACBL Board of Directors and Management are 
    committed to improving acceptable player behavior at all times. In 
    accordance with Laws 74, 80F, 81C4, 90A, 91, and 92A (Laws of Duplicate 
    Bridge) the following policy outlines what is expected of all players during 
    NABCs and other ACBL sponsored events, as well as in the playing area before 
    and after each session. The ultimate 
purpose of the Z-T policy is to create a much more pleasant atmosphere in our 
NABCs. We are attempting to eradicate unacceptable behavior in order to make the 
game of bridge more enjoyable for all. Below are some examples of commendable 
behavior, which, while not required, will significantly contribute to the 
improved atmosphere:  Being a good 
'host' or 'guest' at the table.  Greeting others 
in a friendly manner. Praising the bidding and/or play of the opponents. 
 Having two 
clearly completed convention cards readily available to the opponents (This one 
is a regulation, not just a nicety).   The following 
list are some examples of behavior which will not be tolerated:  Badgering, 
rudeness, insinuations, intimidation, profanity, threats, or violence.  Negative 
comments concerning opponents' or partner's play or bidding.  Constant and 
gratuitous lessons and analyses at the table.  Loud and 
disruptive arguing with a director's ruling.  If a player at 
the table behaves in an unacceptable manner, the director should be called 
immediately. Annoying behavior, embarrassing remarks, or any other conduct which 
might interfere with the enjoyment of the game is specifically prohibited by Law 
74A. Law 91A gives the director the authority to assess disciplinary penalties.
 The following 
procedures have been given to the tournament directors for implementation.  At the start of 
each event, the director shall make an announcement that the tournament will be 
observing ZERO TOLERANCE for unacceptable behavior. It is requested that the 
director be called whenever behavior is not consistent with the guidelines 
outlined above.  The director, 
when called, shall make an assessment of the situation. If it is established 
that there was unacceptable behavior, an immediate ¼ board disciplinary penalty 
(3 IMP in team games) shall be assigned to all offenders. This may involve any 
one or all four players at the table irrespective of who initiated the 
unacceptable behavior. If both members of a partnership are guilty, the 
penalties are additive (¼ board EACH = ½ board!). The Board of Directors 
strongly believes that assignment of disciplinary penalties will improve the 
overall behavior at our tournaments.  If it is 
determined that the same offender is responsible for a second offense in the 
same event, then the offender(s) shall be ejected from future competition in 
that event. An offender removed from an event shall be deemed to have not played 
in the event, no masterpoints will be awarded and no refunds will be made. All 
previously-obtained results shall, however, remain valid as to their effect upon 
other competitors. In the case of a serious offense and in the case of multiple 
offenses (three) during a tournament, a disciplinary committee may be convened 
to determine whether the offender(s) should be allowed to play in other events 
at the tournament and/or whether additional sanctions may be appropriate.  Warnings are 
strongly discouraged and will be given only when there is no clear violation or 
in cases where the facts cannot be determined. Offenders are to receive 
immediate penalties. Regardless of who may have initiated unacceptable behavior, 
ALL offenses are punishable. Retaliatory behavior is a punishable offense. 
Frivolous accusations will also be considered as offenses under this policy.  In accordance 
with the Laws of Duplicate Bridge, a director's decision to impose a 
disciplinary is final; however, all such decisions may be appealed. An appeals 
committee may not overturn the director's decision, but could recommend that the 
director reconsider the imposition of a penalty. It should be noted that the 
committee may feel that the penalty assessed was not severe enough and may refer 
the matter to a disciplinary committee.  A Zero Tolerance 
Report Form shall be available for players to report incidents which occur away 
from the table; and for directors to document complaints and action taken. The 
DIC shall provide a summary report of all behavioral penalties to the Tournament 
Chairman and/or Recorder.  See
ACBL Zero Tolerance Form  Also see
Proprieties,
        Etiquette,
Slow Play   
 |