| The more we learn, the more we still need to know - that's 
    Bridge Is discipline punishment?  No, SIR!It's the art of order and obedience resulting from "training"
   Bid 'em up when you have impunity     Location, location, location
 Controls always beat
    Quackers   Having a bag of tricks (gadgets) can help you get nice treats | 
    If partner opens preemptively with a weak 2 bid, how should I respond with 
    16-17 points and 5 in a major suit and 3 in a side suit (minor). 
    Shucks, this requires another "it depends" answer.   Relevant factors 
    to consider include: 
    How many points does partner's weak 2 promise?  Skilled players have developed 
    specific weak 2 partnership agreements based on vulnerability.   For 
    instance, some play a weak 2 promises 8-10 HCP in first and second seat when 
    vulnerable - known as disciplined preempts.  Others follow a somewhat 
    similar approach using the "Rule 
    of 2-3-4", bidding: 2 levels 
    above available playing tricks with unfavorable vulnerability 3 levels 
    above available playing tricks with neutral (same) vulnerability, and 4 levels 
    above available playing tricks with favorable vulnerability (your side 
    white, opponents’ red).   
    For this discussion, let’s say you and your partner agree to use disciplined 
    preempts.  Using either of the above approaches and assuming partner is 
    vulnerable, you should force game with your holdings.  However, with neutral 
    or favorable vulnerability, you should take a more cautious approach, 
    considering: Where are 
    your honors?  Do they compliment partner’s preemptive suit?   If you don't 
    have working honors, you are less likely to make game.  Also see
    Environmental Factors What is the 
    quality of your honors?  Are the honors in your long major or side suits?  
    If in side suits, you are less likely to make game. What 
    conventional treatment do you use to explore game when partner makes 
    preemptive weak 2 bid?  Do you play RONF 
    (Raise Only Non Forcing), 2N as a "feature 
    ask", or perhaps play an advanced treatment such as
    Ogust (showing weak/strong hands and 
    weak/strong suits)?   Incidentally, the Feature Ask allows preemptive 
    partner to bid a side suit at the 3 level if holding a King or Ace, a great 
    way to investigate if 3 Notrump is possible with sufficient stoppers; this 
    approach also allows responder to query opener for extra strength when 
    exploring game or perhaps slam. 
    Opposite a preemptive weak 2 opener, we could generate some 15 point hands 
    that make game while some 18 pointers that have no chance for game. 
    Finally, as a rule of thumb, with 17 points we typically want to explore 
    game.  Perhaps you'd like to consider books on
    
    Preempts.  
    I hope this helps - good luck on your bridge.   |